Bad American

This is the “democracy” we gave the Iraqis

February 15, 2008 · No Comments

From Dahr Jamail’s Weblog:

(thanks to Scott Schneider my Canadian friend for the heads-up on this)

Here’s a snippet, read the rest:

Jeremy Scahill interviews Dahr Jamail for The Nation

Dahr Jamail: Beyond the Green Zone

by JEREMY SCAHILL

You’ve spent about eight months in Iraq unembedded. A lot of your time was spent with ordinary Iraqis, documenting the suffering, the deaths, the civilian injuries. You’ve also spent time in other countries talking to Iraqi refugees. One of the things that’s lost in the mainstream coverage is the extent of the death that’s happened in Iraq. In fact, there was an AP-Ipsos poll not too long ago that found that a majority of Americans believed that fewer than 10,000 Iraqis had died since the start of the invasion. Give a sense of the scope of the death that has taken place in Iraq.This is a good example of why the media coverage is still so horribly skewed. Even though a lot of people tend to think, “Well, the media is coming around a little bit, that it is showing that the occupation is not going well, and that there’s suffering.” But really, contrast what you may see in some of the larger media outlets with some of these figures from the ground in Iraq.

We look at, for example, how many people have died, based on figures primarily produced by The Lancet report in October ‘06, which showed 655,000 Iraqis had been killed, or 2.5 percent of the total population of the country.

Another group, called Just Foreign Policy, has taken those figures and extrapolated from them based on more recent media reports, because that first survey, that Lancet survey, the legwork was carried out in July 2005. And so from that time until this time, with new data, it’s now estimated by the group Just Foreign Policy that over 1,100,000 Iraqis have been killed. In addition to that, we can estimate that, very conservatively, another 3 million are wounded. According to the UN these figures are too low as well; I’ve been told this by a UN spokesperson myself when I was in Syria last summer.

Current figures: 2.5 million internally displaced Iraqis in their own country, another 2.5 million refugees outside of the country. In addition to that, another 4 million Iraqis are in dire need of emergency assistance, according to an Oxfam International report released last July. When we take into account the fact that Iraq’s total population has fallen from 27 million, when the invasion was launched, to now roughly 23 million, when we add all those figures up, that means over half the total population of the entire country are either refugees–in or out of their country–wounded, in dire need of emergency aid, or dead.

In addition to that, we have the infrastructure, where on every measurable level, it’s worse now than it was after nearly thirty years of Saddam Hussein’s reign, and twelve years of genocidal sanctions. Even oil exports have not for one day been at or above pre-war levels–and this is where Iraq gets 90 percent of its income. Electricity: the average home has anywhere from zero hours of electricity per day to maybe six or seven hours on a really good day. Unemployment: It’s between 60 or 70 percent, vacillating right now. During the sanctions, it was roughly 33 percent, which is about what it was here during the Great Depression. So 60 to 70 percent unemployment, on top of that, 70 percent inflation. We have 45 percent of Iraqis living in abject poverty on less than $1 per day. Seventy percent of Iraqis don’t even have access to safe drinking water. So that gives you an idea of the magnitude of how horrific the suffering really has become. According to Refugees International, it’s the fastest-growing refugee crisis on the planet.

You haven’t been to Iraq for a number of months, but you are regularly in touch with Iraqis on the ground. In fact, a lot of the articles that you do you co-author with Iraqi colleagues still on the ground. Many of the journalists who do go to Iraq are trapped in the Green Zone– or what an Iraqi friend of mine calls the Green Zoo. And so, in a way, you may be in a better position to analyze what’s happening there, because of your regular contact with unembedded Iraqi journalists. Give us a couple of examples of news that’s not making it out of Iraq.

I was recently working on a story about Fallujah because one of my Iraqi colleagues lives there. And again, contrast this with what maybe you’ve been hearing about Fallujah. In fact, it’s even been held up by various Bush Administration officials over the last several months as a model city. Look, it’s calmer, things are better now, the plan is working, the surge is working. Well in Fallujah, according to my friend who lives there, the security measures that were imposed around the city by the US military during the November ‘04 siege–the biometric data, the retina scans, the fingerprinting, the mandatory, bar-coded IDs for everyone trying to go in and out of the city. That remains, that has not changed at all. In addition to that, businesspeople estimate that there’s approximately 80 percent unemployment in the city. There are entire neighborhoods that still do not have electricity or running water since the November ‘04 siege. There’s still tens of thousands of refugees from the city from the April ‘04 siege, not even talking about November.

There’s been a vehicle ban, to one degree or another, imposed on the city since May. So how do you live in a city of 350,000 people, when the majority of the time, you can’t even drive a vehicle. Most people are either walking or literally using horse-drawn or donkey-drawn carts. And he quoted a man as saying, relatively recently, that yes, it is quieter in Fallujah today, but it’s the same quiet as a dead body is quiet. That there’s no normal life, that the hospital there doesn’t get medicines and things that it needs, because of the corruption of the Ministry of Health in Baghdad, and the bias that’s there. And just to give you an idea. That’s life in Fallujah today, where there’s literally no normal life.

And that’s in a city that the US is holding up as a victory?

Exactly.

I know your expertise is not necessarily US domestic politics, but like all of us, you’re following the presidential campaign. Do you see any marked difference for Iraqis in the event of a Hillary Clinton presidency or a Barack Obama presidency?

I don’t. They’ve both already officially taken the idea of total unconditional withdrawal of all occupation forces out of Iraq off the table, until after their first term, if one of them is elected. So it’s off the table already until 2013, even before one of them would come into power, if that is going to happen. In reality, they in no way are reflecting the will of the troops on the ground in Iraq, or the majority of Americans now who are opposed to the occupation. And certainly not respecting the will of the Iraqi people, where the most conservative polls I’ve found have shown that 85 percent, at a minimum now, of the total population of Iraq are completely opposed to the occupation and want it to end, right now.

Iraqis are willing to take the risk of what might happen if that much-discussed “power vacuum” is created. And the reality is that the only real first step to a solution in Iraq is full, immediate, unconditional withdrawal, while simultaneously re-funding all the reconstruction projects and turning them over to Iraqi concerns. So this idea of, “You break it, you buy it.” Well, there’s no buying happening. There’s nothing being done by Western contractors on the ground to improve the basic life necessities of any Iraqi in that country right now.

And the other factor is, which candidate is talking about compensation for the Iraqi people? Every Iraqi person who’s suffered from this situation deserves full compensation from this government. Because this is the government that perpetrated the war and continues on in this illegal occupation. So, I don’t see any of these mainstream candidates talking about any of these things, which are really essential if we’re going to talk about a solution to this catastrophe in Iraq.

Categories: The Empire's Wars · Undercovered

Olbermann Rocks: Its the Fascism Stupid

February 15, 2008 · 2 Comments

This one brought me off the couch high-fiving the ficus plant.

Olberman Special Commentary on FISA Feb. 14

Mr. Bush, you say that our ability to track terrorist threats will be weakened and our citizens will be in greater danger. Yet you have weakened that ability!

You have subjected us, your citizens, to that greater danger! This, Mr. Bush, is simple enough for even you to understand.

For the moment, at least, thanks to some true patriots in the House, and your own stubbornness, you have tabled telecom immunity, and the FISA act.

You. By your own terms and your definitions, you have just sided with the terrorists. You’ve got to have this law, or we’re all going to die. But, practically speaking, you vetoed this law.

It is bad enough, sir, that you were demanding an ex post facto law that could still clear the AT&Ts and the Verizons from responsibility for their systematic, aggressive and blatant collaboration with your illegal and unjustified spying on Americans under this flimsy guise of looking for any terrorists who are stupid enough to make a collect call or send a mass e-mail.

But when you demanded it again during the State of the Union address, you wouldn’t even confirm that they actually did anything for which they deserved to be cleared.

“The Congress must pass liability protection for companies believed to have assisted in the efforts to defend America.”

Believed? Don’t you know? Don’t you even have the guts Dick Cheney showed in admitting they did collaborate with you? Does this endless presidency of loopholes and fine print extend even here? If you believe in the seamless mutuality of government and big business, come out and say it! There is a dictionary definition, one word that describes that toxic blend:

“You’re a fascist — get them to print you a T-shirt with fascist on it! What else is this but fascism?”

At that point it was almost curtains for the ficus plant.

Yes nutbars - your hero, President George W. Bush is a FASCIST. And so are the people who support him. It should have been a Howard Beale moment - run to the windows, the streets and holler it out loud - GEORGE W. BUSH IS A FASCIST AND SO ARE HIS FOLLOWERS AND ADMIRERS!

But then Keith drove it home, baby!

Did you see Mark Klein on this newscast last November?

Mark Klein was the AT&T whistleblower who explained in the placid, dull terms of your local neighborhood IT desk how he personally attached all AT&T circuits, everything, carrying every one of your phone calls, every one of your e-mails, every bit of your Web browsing into a secure room, room No. 641-A at the Folsom Street facility in San Francisco, where it was all copied so the government could look at it.

Not some of it, not just the international part of it, certainly not just the stuff some spy, a spy both patriotic and telepathic, might be able to divine had been sent or spoken by or to a terrorist.

Everything! Every time you looked at a naked picture. Every time you bid on eBay. Every time you phoned in a donation to a Democrat. “My thought was,” Mr. Klein told us last November, “George Orwell’s ‘1984.’ And here I am, forced to connect the Big Brother machine.”

And if there’s one thing we know about Big Brother, Mr. Bush, it is that he is — you are — a liar.

A liar,

A fascist,

A war criminal who should face his own Nuremberg Trial along with his neocon associates

A sociopath

A traitor

And an enemy of the people of the United States.

 

Categories: media · what's left of the left

John McCain: Torture is torture until you need the nutbars. Then it’s. . . something else

February 15, 2008 · No Comments

The Lady Arianna in Huffpo just nailing it.

Could any political creature be a bigger hypocrite than John McCain?

McCain the maverick had been unequivocal in his condemnation of torture, and eloquent in expressing why. “We’ve sent a message to the world that the United States is not like the terrorists,” he said at an Oval Office appearance in December 2005, after he had forced the president to endorse an earlier torture ban McCain had authored and pushed through (a ban the president quickly subverted with a signing statement). “What we are is a nation that upholds values and standards of behavior and treatment of all people, no matter how evil or bad they are. And I think this will help us enormously in winning the war for the hearts and minds of people throughout the world in the war on terror.”

He made a similar case on the campaign trail in Iowa in October 2007: “When I was imprisoned, I took heart from the fact that I knew my North Vietnamese captors would never be treated like I was treated by them. There are much better and more effective ways to get information. You torture someone long enough, he’ll tell you whatever he thinks you want to know.”

And there was this pithy and powerful summation of why torture should never be an option: “It’s not about who they are, it’s about who we are.”

Of course, all that was before he put his conscience in leg irons — and before caving to the would-be Torquemadas on the Right became his campaign strategy.

Now we get tortured logic instead. Taking to the Senate floor to justify his vote against the torture ban yesterday, McCain twisted himself in knots trying to explain how he could sponsor a bill — the 2006 Detainee Treatment Act — that prohibits the use of any cruel, inhumane, or degrading treatment by the military while voting against a bill that would extend that ban to the CIA and other intelligence agencies: “It is important to the war on terror that the CIA have the ability to [detain and interrogate terrorists]. At the same time the CIA’s interrogation program has to abide by the rules, including the standards of the Detainee Treatment Act.”

Got that? The CIA has to abide by rules prohibiting torture but we can’t tie the CIA’s hands by making it abide by rules prohibiting torture. Straight talk, RIP.

What’s more, McCain said he voted against the bill because it would be a mistake to “tie the CIA to the Army Field Manual” — a Manual he gave a ringing endorsement to in a November debate: “I just came back from visiting a prison in Iraq. The army general there said that techniques under the Army Field Manual are working and working effectively, and he didn’t think they need to do anything else. My friends, this is what America is all about.”

But not apparently once you have the White House in your sights. Then all bets — and deeply held convictions — are off.

It’s not just straight talk that’s RIP it’s also deeply held convictions on what kind of nation we’re supposed to be. If we want to lower ourselves to the level of a tinhorn dictatorship, we’re doing a great job.

This morning I almost threw something heavy at the screen when Glenn Beck was on. Of course, TV’s are cheaper nowadays but still, I restrained myself. Anyway, Beck was talking about how he STILL doesn’t trust McCain no matter how much this supposedly honorable man kisses the ass of the nutbar fascist right.

Beck especially mentioned McCain’s flip flop on waterboarding, which makes him suspicious that the former POW doesn’t appreciate how much fun it is to torture people who don’t look like us because, well, its so effective a technique.

So effective that I recall being personally told by Army interrogators at Fort Bragg (while in uniform) on more than one occasion that it just doesn’t work. But it works for Jack Bauer, and, hell, it’s just so much fun, so who cares what the experts say?

And then Beck said he really didn’t believe it was torture anyway.

At that point I had a wonderful, delicious fantasy. Something I’d like to see done as a sketch on Saturday Night Live (but they won’t do now that they’ve long ago been politically neutered). It would have Beck sitting in that silly studio getup he was in this morning saying the exact same thing.

But then some real Army interrogators come in from offscreen and say “hey Glenn, if it’s not torture than maybe you wouldn’t mind us giving you a taste, eh?”

Beck: Now wait a minute guys. .  .

But to no avail - they pin Beck down on a nearby table and give him a taste of waterboarding while he screams and gasps.

Bad taste? I don’t think so. If you don’t think waterboarding is torture than why not submit to the procedure since it apparently is no worse than getting the third degree down at the station?

I’m sure Mr. Beck would find the experience highly educational. It may give him something he and lot of his followers lack - an appreciation for basic humanity - that real human beings, many who are innocent of nothing more than being at the wrong place at the wrong time - experience terrific pain and fear inflicted by others. And that when it happens, you’ll say anything at all to make it stop.

But of course, when such a tactic remains a purely theoretical exercise inflicted on others, well, then its harder to have that. . . oh, what’s that word again the right has such trouble with? Oh, yeah, empathy! They always have it for millionaires who have to pay taxes but maybe they could learn that empathy is also a handy emotion to expend on the downtrodden of the world as well. It’s what the person they claim as their Savior commanded them to do, but they don’t talk much about that.

Maybe John McCain would consent to a few seconds of simulated drowning. Might get him in touch with his basic humanity which is being excised from his personhood due to an overweening desire to be President before he dies. How would his life otherwise be validated?

By the way, in case I haven’t written it lately, Arianna rocks.

Categories: Police state · The Perpetual Campaign

Hillary Should Kick Rush in His “Testicle Lockbox”

February 15, 2008 · 1 Comment

From Media Matters.

Look, you readers know I’m for Obama and you know what differences of political opinion I have with Hillary Clinton and why I can’t support her (although if it were her and McCain, well. . . ok, gimme a scotch and steer me to the polling place).

But this continuing shit by Rush Limbaugh and others is beyond the pale. This IS sexism (paging Ms. Jong, now you and I can agree) and just, well, un-gentlemanly for lack of a better term. But Limbaugh is a punk who broadcasts for punks.

LIMBAUGH: But that’s all the least of this. The Clintons will not concede. If the superdelegates go [Sen. Barack] Obama, the Clintons will not concede on the cheap. They have the threat of a lawsuit over Michigan and then the threat of a lawsuit over Florida. And as you know, lawsuits can go from a court to a court of appeals to the Supreme Court. Unless of course, the party plays tribute to the Clintons, and what might that tribute be, I have no clue, but whatever you might imagine it to be, double it or triple it. Because Mrs. Clinton’s testicle lockbox is big enough for the entire Democrat hierarchy, not just some people in the media. And whether they have been taking steroids and the testicles are smaller than usual doesn’t matter. Her lockbox, her testicle lockbox can handle everybody in the Democrat hierarchy.

I wish some talented editorial cartoonist or artist of some kind would draw Hillary giving Rush a boot in the jewels. Or maybe in that ass cyst that kept his sorry patriotic ass out of the Vietnam War.

Categories: media · right wingnuttery

NIU Shooting: ENOUGH! (from the university and cops)

February 15, 2008 · 2 Comments

I’m listening right now to the press conference at Northern Illinois University about yesterday’s shooting and all I am hearing is (1) university officials covering their ass and congratulating themselves on their crisis plans and (2) university cops patting themselves on the back and covering their ass describing their own crisis plans.

There are seven people dead and scores wounded and barely a nod from the NIU officials on the tragic loss of life. And what they do say about it sounds like it was written by lawyers or PR professionals. It seems like they’re only anticipating their stance in future lawsuits.

They could possibly talk about how they’ll try to make sure this will never happen again, but of course, such guarantees are impossible.

Of course, my thoughts, like any parent with a son or daughter living on a college campus, turns to concern about their safety - any one of those students at NIU could have been any one of ours anywhere.

Even CNN has cut away from the mass back-slapping to cover the Bobby Cutts Jr. verdict live.

Categories: Uncategorized