Bad American

Time to Get Down and Dirty When Dealing With Repug Fascists

March 26, 2008 · 3 Comments

John Dolan in Alternet

I’ve only been saying this on this blog for how long?

I’d like to suggest a very simple strategy for American liberals: Get mean. Stop policing the language and start using it to hurt our enemies. American liberals are so busy purging their speech of any words that might offend anyone that they have no notion of using language to cause some salutary pain.

Why, for example, not popularize slogans that mock the Bush loyalists as “suckers”? Something like, “There are two kinds of Republicans: millionaires and suckers.” Put that on a few bumper stickers and I guarantee a lot of “South Park Republicans” will quit the GOP. They just smirk when you tsk-tsk at them for being disrespectful. They want to be disrespectful; every normal young male wants to be.

And this, of course, brings up a big issue: At some point liberal writers are going to have to decide if it’s OK to be young and male at all. For better or for worse, millions of American men hold on to playground ethics long after they leave elementary school. For most of them, the 2004 election came down to a classic playground scene: Would John Kerry defend himself when attacked by bullies? Liberals, still stunned by the way a legitimate combat vet like Kerry was beaten by a combat-dodging spoiled brat like Bush, never understood that for millions of voters, the question wasn’t how well Kerry fought in Vietnam but whether he would fight in 2004.

A LOT of Alternet readers got stuck right there. One poster said they read the part about playground ethics and then refused to read the rest of the article. Although I have commented quite a bit on this thread (as kegbot1) I refrained from answering that poster but the problem is: Dolan is right.

Many, many, many American men do NOT evolve from the basic playground bullying stage and it doesn’t prevent them from becoming very prominent players in out society. And they vote AND they also influence the coverage of issues in the media.

So implying they are suckers and not backing down may indeed have a better long term effect than trying to play nice and reason with them.

And if nothing else, making your opinions heard on local politically neutral boards gets your message out rebutting the repugs as I did with the insufferable Joe Amschlinger here.

Silence is no longer an option when everything good and decent about our society and planet is under dire threat.

Now a lot of women readers also stopped and complained about that playground mentality analogy as well. I understand their objections but the vast majority of the shot callers on the right are male both in the media and in the political structure. There are only a few Ann Coulters (thank Goddess) and Laura Ingrahams. We have to deal with the world as it is, not always as we would wish it to be. Yes, testosterone gets us into these messes but it is exactly the testosterone that needs to be confronted.

I’m often reminded of the Woody Allen line in the one movie (I can’t remember it now) where his friends (like many of the posters on Alternet) kept telling Woody that Nazis need to be met with biting sarcasm and ridicule. Woody kept saying: no, no with Nazis you have to give them a punch in the face.

And that is it exactly - at least a rhetorical punch in the face.

Categories: Getting Personal · what's left of the left

3 responses so far ↓

  • Jill // March 26, 2008 at 2:04 pm

    Well - I’ll fulfill my stereotypical role here which I try not to embrace: you do SUCH a good job of getting down and dirty with the element you describe, I don’t have to. :)

    I know - no excuse.

  • kegbot1 // March 26, 2008 at 2:35 pm

    You know Jill, every now and then you could throw everyone a curve and say something reallllllllyyyyy nasty! Shake everyone up. But only now and then - you wouldn’t want to damage your carefully crafted image. :)

    Thanks for the comment.

  • K // March 26, 2008 at 9:38 pm

    You know what, I was going to post about this, but I just don’t see the point.

    It’s all pretty much irrelevant.

    Democrats, Republicans, what’s the difference? They are the masters, we are the slaves.

    How about something worth thinking about? Is there a point to All of This? Why are we here? Why is the universe the way it is? What does it mean that all life must kill to continue living? Is there something more beyond this existence? How do I reconcile the fact that I must kill to stay alive with my understanding that to kill harms me also?

    These animals that fight and kill one another for some transitory sense of control are beneath notice.

    The singularity approaches whether we try to stop it or not. The fools in power think they will control what cannot be imagined, much less controlled. Within fifty years the nature of humanity will change completely. Those who come after will not be the same species. They will be as different from us as we are from monkeys.

    That is assuming we do not destroy ourselves first. Some very smart people estimate that the probability of the human species surviving another hundred years is about fifty percent.

    Who gives a damn about Hillary Clinton in that context?

Leave a Comment